"The Law
is the Weapon;
the Courtroom
the Battlefield,

Erwin Rommel School of Law

The Judge
is your Enemy,
your Lawyer
is an Enemy Spy"

Your ability to use the American Legal System as a survival skill in our day equals our forefathers' ability to use firearms as a survival skill in 1776.

ERSOL has the necessary tools to teach you how to understand and use the American Legal System.
Federal or State, civil or criminal, plaintiff or defendant-- we'll show you what really works.

Erwin Rommel Goes Digital
Our 2018 Discounted “Whole Enchilada” Offer

The entire Erwin Rommel Catalogue-- all our Law Seminars, their manuals,
all books we've produced plus all of “DeWaynn's World” is now digitized
and available on a stand-by hard drive.   If you seek to immerse yourself
in every Mike Brown Training Seminar with all of our training tools,
plus some extras, call for details.

Anti-Constitutional Federal Judges

  What President Trump Can and Should Do

            Donald Trump isn’t the first President of the United States to have problems with federal judges.  Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, and Franklin Roosevelt had problems with them as well.

            The federal judiciary has become increasingly arrogant and irresponsible.  Put your grievance before a judge or even panel of judges, especially in a federal criminal case.  The judge won’t read what is put in front of them, they will not address the issues raised, and they will certainly not apply the proper legal standards.

            Why should they?  They have given themselves “judicial immunity”.  They are immune to lawsuits for money damages.  Worse, they allow law clerks and staff attorneys to ghostwrite most of their opinions for them. Consider:

Richard Arnold of Arkansas, a judge who sits on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, is a product of the Old South school of courtly manners.  He is equally comfortable holding forth on an early 19th-century British case, the U.S. Constitution or a richly embellished anecdote. But he is less genteel when talking about what is happening to the federal courts.  Speaking at the Drake University Law School last week, Arnold was asked about a story in The New York Times reporting that because of crushing workloads, some federal appeals courts are resorting to perfunctory one-word rulings—”Affirmed” or “Denied”—with no written opinion giving the court’s reasoning.
The practice is an “abomination,” Arnold said.  He told of participating recently in a court session where more than 50 cases were decided in two hours.  “We heard many, many cases with no opinions or unpublished opinions,” Arnold said. “I felt dirty.  It was a . . . betrayal of the judicial ethos.  It makes me feel terrible.”
Perfunctory justice:  Overloaded federal judges increasingly are resorting to one-word rulings, Des Moines Register (March 26, 1999).

The aggrieved party read and reread the briefs as well as the transcripts.  His mind is fed on nothing else during the three months waiting for the action of the court.  He knows every point raised.  He can repeat every argument advanced.  All his savings through a lifetime are tied up in the case.  He knows he is right.  Then comes the decision.  It deals with none of the points argued.  It shows on its face the court refused to read the brief.  He had been tossed aside like a white chip.  He knows, and his friends know, he has been denied his day in court.

To that man, to his family and to his friends, organized society is organized iniquity.

And the present system is manufacturing citizens of such sentiments by the thousands every year.

Underneath the social unrest of the world today, as its main underlying cause, is the feeling in the breasts of the masses that justice is not for them.  They do not know the cause, nor can they suggest the remedy,—and so they only want to destroy.  Society to them has come to mean organized injustice.

John Rustgard, Dry Bones—The Remedy for the Evil, 88 Central Law Journal, p. 341, 344 (May 9, 1919)

            How does this happen?  Someone other than a federal judge actually does the research and writing of “their” (the judges) opinions.  Someone who doesn’t have life tenure and serves at the pleasure of the judge he – or she – works for.  Someone who doesn’t want to “rock the boat” or disturb the status quo.  Someone like a law clerk or staff attorney.

            So how does the President bring these misbehaving federal judges under control?  It is simple.

            The published opinions are full of references to “public confidence in the judiciary.”  I.e., once the public loses confidence in federal judges and recognizes them for what they are (welfare recipients in robes) and loses respect for them, the game is over.

            How does the President do this?

            It’s simplicity itself.  All the President has to do is have his pardon attorney pick out one federal criminal case a month in which an American citizen got shafted by a lazy judge who didn’t follow the law.  Then pardon him (or her) and explain why the pardon power had to be exercised.  I.e., the President had to do the job the judge was too lazy to do.

            The judge then becomes an object of public ridicule.  As Mark Twain once said, “Against the assault of laughter, nothing can stand.”

            How would you like to be a federal judge who just made the national news for not doing his (or her) job?  After the first half dozen or so federal judges are held up to public ridicule, how long do you think it will be before others will “straighten up and fly right” for fear of them being the next target of the Presidents wrath?

No legislative body ever gave Judges immunity.  They gave it to themselves.  Read our Legislation to take away the Immunity from Judges set for introduction in Alabama.

The Latest from ERSOL....

New Book by Michael H. Brown:


Criminal Defendant's Bible - by Michael H. Brown


The   American   Criminal   Justice   System

How   It   Really   Works

How   To   Beat   It


         The first thing you have to understand about the American Criminal Justice System is that it is a complete fraud. The methods for overcoming a fraud are entirely different from those used to play a game that isn’t rigged. You have to know what to expect in real life, not what the books tell you that you should expect.

         You can win in a game in which the other side cheats continuously. You just have to know how the other side is cheating and then devise a strategy to overcome it. Let’s start with the players.

The   Judge


         The judge is supposed to be an impartial referee. At the federal level, there is even a statute that says so:

28   U.S.C.   § 453.   Oaths  of  Justices  and  Judges


         Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or          affirmation before performing the duties of this office: “I, ________, do solemnly          swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do          equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially          discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ________ under the          Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”


         In real life, the judge will (almost) always “put his thumb on the scales” in favor of the government. This is most readily seen in rulings on pretrial motions. No matter how much merit a motion may have, especially if a motion should result in a dismissal of the case, the judge will deny it.

         Why? The judge is attempting to demoralize you into taking a “plea bargain.”

         Your strategy is to file pretrial motions in order to build a record for appeal.

The   Prosecutor

         Prosecutors routinely stack bogus charges on indictments for two reasons.

The first reason is that if the prosecutor can make you think that you are facing conviction for a lot more charges than he had the right to bring against you, then it is that much easier for him to terrorize you into a “plea bargain.”

         The second reason is that the prosecutor has a much better chance of persuading a jury that you are guilty (of at least something) if a jury has an impressive array of charges to convict you of. How are a dozen average citizens supposed to know what a bogus charge is and what isn’t?    What the prosecutor did (stack bogus charges) needs to be pointed out in your pretrial motions.

The   Defense   Attorney

         Counsel for the defense is often the biggest problem. You can survive the denial of your pretrial motions by the judge and the stacking of bogus charges by the prosecutor. Surviving the machinations of you own lawyer is another matter entirely.

         In the last decade or so “defense” lawyers have come up with a way to get their clients to plead guilty and save themselves the bother of doing your pretrial work and defending you in a trial (which consists merely of “going through the motions”).

         What defense attorneys do these days is simply ask for repeated continuances, often for months at a time. The judge always grants the continuances and the prosecutor never objects. They’re in on the game.

         The defendant, after months (more often years) of sitting in a cockroach-infested jail cell, finally “breaks” and takes a “plea bargain” in order to get to a regular prison, where he will hopefully be able to get some fresh air and decent food.

         Your objective should be to get to trial as soon as you have filed all your pretrial motions. The feds and all the states have what are called “statutory speedy trial” statutes. I.e., the judge can give you “excludable time” (the clock isn’t running) while he is considering your motions. Once he thinks he has you demoralized, you hit him with a demand for speedy trial. At the federal level, that is 70 days.

         Your attorney will tell you “he’s not prepared.” He is never going to be prepared. Get it through your head you will get convicted. The results will be the same whether your attorney fights your case tooth and nail (don’t hold your breath on this one) or you turn your back to the judge and just sit there for the entire trial.


Criminal Law Seminars Sample Pleadings for Sale 9 Live ERSOL Seminars
Training Videos You Can Use Our Legal System Doesn't Work
We Need Your Help
Law and Legalism
Legal Research --
Overturning Your Conviction
Self-Study Law Course Bible as Law / Odds and Ends
ERSOL Videos Suing a Lawyer for Malpractice Consultation Services & Miscellaneous
  Products & Services

Erwin Rommel
School of Law
Package Deals
"The Whole Enchilada"
Criminally Accused / Criminal Defendants Combo
Criminal Defendant's Whole Enchilada
Civil and Criminal Enchilada Combo

Featured Articles
The Icelandic Solution
Why are you called Erwin Rommel? The Commie Lesson
On Lawyers in America Annual Sabbath Calendar 2011
The 1828 Webster's Online Dictionary Public Denied Hearing at Public Hearing
Top 10 things that sound dirty in law but aren't Bring Erwin Rommel's Seminar to you
Bouvier's 1856 Law Dictionary Greatest Bible News in 400+ Years
On Abortion in America Plural Marriage
Satisfied Customers Coverture / Marriage and Family
General George Patton's Famous Speech Pig & Pork Facts
...into the Digital Age (UPDATE) Foreclosure/Mortgage-Gate, Fraud-Gate

Featured Books by Michael H. Brown

Defending A Drug Case

Criminal Defendant's Bible

Ordering Information & Shipping Details
Any Questions? Email us: RommelLaw@aol.com


    Would you have been better off giving your money to a thug with a mask and a gun than paying the last lawyer you hired?
Do you know how to sue him for legal malpractice?  Did the judge act like he just returned from the Inquisition?
Do you know how to sue him with a Complaint For Judicial Misconduct?

    Learn how the American legal system really works. You can aggressively pursue
& defend your rights in court without the deleterious expense of hiring the court's officer.  

Frame constitutional arguments & WIN!

Contact info:

Erwin Rommel School of Law's Address:

Peter  Jon  Simpson
c/o  P O  Box  211
Atwater  Minnesota  56209- 0211

Phone:   320-857-2400

"It's  not  what  you  don't  know  that  hurts  you; it's  what  you  know  that  ain't  so!"


Hello Peter,

This is Nelson I ordered several books and a seminar DVD set from you so that I could learn how to defend myself in my current situation out here in California.  I really have to thank you for helping me and even taking the time to take my calls.  I really want to learn as much as I can and would like to order more books and DVD sets from you.

Current case status:  I submitted a demurer (9 pages) and motions to dismiss due to faulty charging document and DA started panicking and asked judge to allow him time to review my argument, next court date, DA doesn't show....stuck in traffic was the story, after 5 hours! next date DA hands me "amended information", of the two original charges the 2nd disapeared completely and were replaced with the exact wording as the first with the exception of the date!  Still two charges, (duplicity!) and still missing the facts, all conclusory.  Tried to get me to take a plea in open court and I argued that this still looked horrible and I would be seeking to dismiss and will be filing another demurer, judge agreed and said I didn't need to plea as that would waive demurrer!  The hearing before this one they had made me an offer for 32 months state prison, a strike, & 5 years parole!  Or face 7 years in prison if lost trial, judge asked me if I would counter offer, I said sure....dismiss all charges with prejudice.  They didn't take it!  So I have court in two weeks and am working on my motions, Peter again thank you so much you have no idea how much this has helped me to gain the courage to stand toe to toe with these weasles.  No stuttering, pauses, nothing.  Just straight to the point with a smile (It wasnt always like that though!).  I'll be giving you a call in the next couple days, I havent called in a while as lost phone line but getting new line this week.  Talk to you soon and again I cant thank you enough for lighting the fire within.  Now I can't get enough of it!

Kindest Regards,
Nelson O,
Los Angeles, California

Ahoy PJS,

     I've been wanting to write you for the past ten years......but I had nothing to say until now.

     We met 17 years ago on Singer Island, probably September, with D Rodgers, Brian Korpi, Bill Korpi, and me Jeff Wright in attendance.  I didnt' understand anything of what you guys were teaching. but I was afraid to lose.  So I somehow won.  I faced at that time 4 counts of unlicensed contracting.  I wrote so many dumb ass motions, it was unbelieveable.  Judge Parker after acquitting one charge and nolle prossing 3 others (go figure) said, "Son, You have to learn to develop a sense of humor about these things."

     I was re-acquainted with your former business partner a few months before he passed last year while he was trying to educate someone here in Florida.  I had no idea he was so ill.  I am glad I met him when I did, because I was trying to figure out the "Bruce Lee Ghost Step."  He put it in perspective.

     After going through numerous court cases with friends and my self, I have changed my opinion of your last quote about the courtroom, the judge and the attorney.  THEY ARE YOUR FRIENDS.  BEST FRIENDS, because through them you will be set free.  (They can't handle the truth.)

     In every court case I witnessed, they deny 40 - 50 constitutional and procedural rights, and in the end, you win.  It is almost impossible to lose in criminal court.  If one thinks about it long enough, each case is presented by the prosecution with falsified evidence, fabrication of court documents and forging of official records.  What is the sense of doing legal research in the face of lies, lies and more lies?  After writing more than 100 useless motions/appeals/writs/habeus petitions, I have learned to sit back and relax.  My enemies lead me to victory by denying each and everyone of my constitutional rights.  Then, I write a few Notices to the court: Ineffective Counsel, Judicial Misconduct, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Felony Deprivations of Constitutional Rights,

     Hope all is well with you.  Thanks for getting me started.


Jeff W

This page has been accessed times.